Bhupram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The bail application was dismissed as the petitioner was absent and no instructions were provided on the listed dates. The order recorded a default due to want of prosecution.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 5151/2018
Bhupram S/o Himmatram, By Caste Bishnoi, Resident Of Bilochawale, P.s. Goluwala, District Hanumangarh. Presently Lodged At Sub Jail Suratgarh District Sriganganagar
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.S. Rathore, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
12/11/2018
On 18.7.2018, learned counsel Mr.Pankaj Gupta has pleaded no instructions on behalf of the petitioner. Thereafter, the matter was listed on 20.8.2018 and 4.10.2018, however, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Bhupram S/o Himmatram
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
Coram
VIJAY BISHNOI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/5151/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court