Mukesh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Order in a bail application where the High Court refused to enlarge the petitioner on bail, directing the trial court to expedite the trial.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 3340/2018
Mukesh S/o Shri Padma Ram, By Caste Suthar, R/o Katarda, P.s. Boranada, Tehsil Luni, Disrict Jodhpur. (At Present Lodged At Central Jail, Jodhpur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitin Ojha For Respondent(s) : Mr. O.P. Rathi, P.P., for the State Mr. S.K. Dadhich, complainant
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA
Order
21/08/2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mukesh S/o Shri Padma Ram
- respondent
State Of Rajasthan
Coram
P.K. LOHRA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/3340/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court