Manoj Gwala Vs State

The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 74/2018 of Police Station Kudi Bhagtasani Jodhpur, Jodhpur for the offence punishable under Sections 342, 384, 420, 143 and 120-B of IPC. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Counsel for the petitioner submits that the offences are triable by Magistrate. The accused-petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accused-petitioner.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶15

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-3070/2018]

¶18

case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Manoj Gwala S/o Shri Tejaram shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 74/2018 of Police Station Kudi Bhagtasani Jodhpur, Jodhpur provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.80,000/with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.40,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶20

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG) J.

¶21

TN/58

Manoj Gwala v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Gwala v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dalpat Singh Vs State

Ramniwas Vs State

Surja Ram Vs State

Hemu Vs State

Chiman Lal and Anr. Vs State

Sukhdev Vs State