Surja Ram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Rajasthan High Court rejected the appeal for anticipatory bail, refusing the request but permitting surrender by a specific date with an instruction to the trial court to decide the subsequent bail application on the same day.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail rejected; surrender permitted before 09.04.2018; trial court directed to decide bail application immediately upon surrender.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 380 / 2018
Surja Ram S/o Bhiya Ram, By Caste Bishnoi, Resident of Dhaka Ki Dhani, Kaparda Tehsil Bilara District Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Birbal Saran
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Aswathi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG Order
22/03/2018
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant.
After hearing learned counsel for the appellant, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the appellant, hence this criminal appeal is rejected.
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the appellant.
Whether the appellant can be arrested before surrendering for trial.
Whether the concerned trial court is bound to decide the bail application expeditiously.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Surja Ram
- respondent
The State of Rajasthan
Coram
Manoj Kumar Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLAS/380/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court