Allowed

Smt Manori @ Manohari v. State

Rajasthan HC16 Apr 2018CRLMB/2953/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. pending trial in an FIR involving IPC and PDPP Act offences, subject to a personal bond of Rs.80,000 with two sureties of Rs.40,000 each, failing to which the bail would lapse.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on personal bond of Rs.80,000 with two sureties of Rs.40,000 each subject to specified conditions.

Smt Manori @ Manohari Vs State — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 2953 / 2018 Smt Manori @ Manohari W/o Bhajanaram, by caste Vishnoi, aged about 58 years, R/o Jambheshwar Nagar Motai, Tehsil Baap, P.S. Chaku, District Jodhpur.

¶3

Versus

¶4

State of Rajasthan

¶5

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. BR Godara

¶6

For Respondent(s) : Mr. AS Rathore, PP

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶8

Judgment / Order

¶9

16/04/2018

¶10

This anticipatory bail application has been filed by the petitioner apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.3/2018, Police Station Chaku, District Jodhpur, for the offences under Section 147, 341, 353 and 332/149 of IPC and Section 3 of PDPP Act.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the coaccused Smt. Keshar has already been granted bail by this court. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner behind the bars for indefinite time. Thus, the petitioner may be released on anticipatory bail.

¶12

Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶13

(2 of 2)

¶14

[CRLMB-2953/2018]

¶15

Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.

¶16

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and upon a consideration of the arguments advanced at the bar, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

¶17

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of petitioner Smt Manori @ Manohari W/o Bhajanaram, in connection with FIR No.3/2018, Police Station Chaku, District Jodhpur, the petitioner shall be released on bail; provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.80,000/along with two sureties of Rs.40,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned Investigating Officer/S.H.O. on the following conditions :-

¶18

(i). that the petitioner shall make herself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶19

(ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer; and

¶20

(iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.

¶21

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG) J.

¶22

Hanuman/51

Smt Manori @ Manohari v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Manori @ Manohari v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Kumar Vs State

Salman and Anr. Vs State

Sunny @ Bablu Vs State

Chandrashekhar Vs State

Bhanwarlal Vs State

Smt Gulabi Vs State