Sajna v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court granted bail to the petitioner, a female accused, under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in a trial for offences under Section 307 and others of IPC, directing her to execute a bond with sureties.
What did the court decide?
Bail granted to petitioner with direction to execute personal bond of Rs. 80,000/- and two sureties of Rs. 40,000/- each.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 2841 / 2018
Sajna W/o Lichhu Ram, By Caste Bhopa, Resident of Shyorani Police Station Nohar District Hanumangarh. (At Present Lodged in Sub Jail, Nohar).
----Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Bijarnia
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, PP
For Complainant : Mr. GR Bhari
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG Judgment / Order
03/04/2018
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the accused petitioner in connection with offences under sections 307, 452, 323, 341, 325 of IPC.
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. considering that she is a lady and suffered simple injuries.
Whether a personal bond with sureties is an adequate condition for bail in the pending trial.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sajna W/o Lichhu Ram
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
Manoj Kumar Garg
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/2841/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court