This bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.c. challenged an FIR involving cheating. The grant of bail was allowed considering the petitioner's contention that the alleged cash transaction post-demonetization was improbable.
Bail granted on a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 263 / 2018
Akshatraj Kothari S/o Shri Anil Kothari B/c Jain, R/o Makan No. 3- A-25, Housing Board Banswara, Police Station Kotwali, Banswara, Distt. Banswara (raj.) (at Present Confined in Distt. Jail Kota)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Anil Upman
For Respondent(s) : Mr.R.R.Singh Rathore,PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Order
12/01/2018
petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-263/2018]
(PANKAJ BHANDARI), J.
teekam/78
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application filed by the accused under Section 439 Cr.P.c. should be allowed considering the doubts regarding the transaction over demonetization era.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Akshatraj Kothari
State of Rajasthan
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
