Allowed

Dilip Kumar and Ors. v. State

Rajasthan HC12 Mar 2018CRLMB/2223/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application sought release for four accused persons arrested under Sections 420, 406, and 120B IPC. The High Court granted bail without expressing an opinion on the merits, directing release upon execution of a bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

The petitioners are released on bail on execution of a personal bond of Rs.2,00,000/with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each for appearance before the trial court.

Dilip Kumar and Ors. Vs State — Corruption | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 2223 / 2018

¶3

Dilip Kumar Son of Ganesh Prasad, By Caste Soni, Resident of 9/23, Sector No. A, Patel Nagar, Indra Nagar, Gazipur Police Station, District Luckhnow (UP).

¶4

Pawan Kumar Son of Ganesh Prasad, By Caste Soni, Resident of A-457, Behind Lekhraj Market, Indra Nagar, Gazipur Police Station, Luckhnow (UP)

¶5

Rakesh Kumar Son of Ganesh Prasad, By Caste Soni, Resident of 639, Public 310 Parmeshwar Vihar, Sector No.14, Indra Nagar, Gazipur Police Station, Luckhnow (UP)

¶6

Vijay Kumar Son of Ganesh Kumar, By Caste Soni, Resident of 65-B Mayur Vihar Colony, Indra Nagar, Gazipur Police Station, Luckhnow (UP) (Lodged in Sub Jail, Nohar)

¶7

----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan ----Respondent _____________________________________________________

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Sharma

¶9

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Awasthi, PP

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG

¶11

Order 12/03/2018

¶12

The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.514/2016 of Police Station Nohar, District Hanumangarh for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 406, 120B IPC. They have preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶13

Counsel for the petitioners submits that similarly situated coaccused has already been released on bail by this Court. The case of the present accused-petitioners is similar to that of the coaccused. The accused-petitioners are in judicial custody and the

¶14

(2 of 2)

¶15

[CRLMB-2223/2018]

¶16

trial of the case will take sufficient long time to be concluded. Therefore, the benefit of bail should be granted to the accusedpetitioners.

¶17

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶18

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioners (1) Dilip Kumar Son of Ganesh Prasad, (2). Pawan Kumar Son of Ganesh Prasad, (3). Rakesh Kumar Son of Ganesh Prasad, and (4). Vijay Kumar Son of Ganesh Kumar shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.514/2016 of Police Station Nohar, District Hanumangarh provided they execute a personal bond in a sum of Rs.2,00,000/with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for their appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶20

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG)J.

¶21

Ms/-75

Dilip Kumar and Ors. v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dilip Kumar and Ors. v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Pal and Ors. Vs State

Sikiya @ Sikandar Vs State

Hemant Upadhyay Vs State

Ravi @ Ravindra Singh Vs State

Rakesh Kumar Vs State

Mahendra Singh Vs State