The appeal was dismissed because it was not pressed. The court granted liberty for a fresh appeal contingent on recording the prosecutrix's statement directed at the trial court.
Liberty granted to file a fresh criminal appeal after the trial court records the statement of the prosecutrix.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Appeal No. 72 / 2018
Ravi @ Ravindra Singh S/o Pappu @ Kuldeep Singh, By Caste Ramgadiya, Resident of Ward No. 20, P.S. Anupgarh, District Sriganganagar (At Present Lodged At Central Jail Shriganganagar)
----Petitioner
Versus
State of Rajasthan Through Public Prosecutor.
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : DR. Sachin Acharya
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Pankaj Avasthi, PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG
Judgment / Order
12/03/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press this criminal appeal at this stage.
Accordingly, this criminal appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
However, liberty is given to the appellant to file a fresh criminal appeal after recording the statement of prosecutrix. The trial court is directed to record the statement of the prosecutrix as early as possible.
(MANOJ KUMAR GARG) J.
Hanuman/60
Ravi @ Ravindra Singh
State of Rajasthan
Manoj Kumar Garg
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
