Allowed

Inder Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC6 Apr 2018CRLMB/2017/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single-judge High Court bench allowed bail in a theft case under Section 379 IPC. The court emphasized the petitioner's prior acquittals and lack of serious antecedents, directing release on personal bond with sureties subject to appearance conditions.

What did the court decide?

Accused released on bail with personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each, undertaking to appear in court.

Inder Gurjar Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Bail and Remand | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail No. 2017/2018

¶3

Inder Gurjar S/o Shri Chhangga Ram Gurjar B/c Gurjar, R/o Village Raghnathpura, P.s. Nadoti Distt. Kauroli (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Judicial Custody In Central Jail Jaipur)

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of Rajasthan Through P.p.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Raj Kumar Goyal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI

¶10

Judgment / Order

¶11

06/04/2018

¶12

Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C.

¶13

F.I.R. No.266/2017 was registered at Police Station Pratap Nagar, Jaipur for offence under Section 379 of I.P.C.

¶14

It is contended by counsel for the petitioner that the matter pertains to theft of motorcycle. Charges have been framed. Out of the criminal antecedents pointed out against the accused, he has been acquitted in five cases. Criminal antecedents are prior to the year, 2013.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

I have considered the contentions.

¶17

Considering the contentions put forth by counsel for the petitioner, I deem it proper to allow the bail application.

¶18

(2 of 2)

¶19

[CRLMB-2017/2018]

¶20

This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused petitioner shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶21

However, it is made clear that if the petitioner repeats the offence, State would be free to move application for cancellation of bail before the concerned Court.

¶22

A copy of this order be sent to concerned S.H.O. for recording this condition in the Village Crime Record Book so that in the event of petitoner's repeating offence, S.H.O. can move the Court for cancellation of bail.

¶23

(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J

¶24

Arti/61

Inder Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Inder Gurjar v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhagirathmal Vs Lalaram andORS

Mohammad Saddik Kadri Vs State Education Departmentors

Uttam Kumar Agarwal Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Kailash Chand Vs State of Raj and Ors.

Vijay Singh Gurjar Vs Shri Gajendra Singh Thakur

Sunita Kumari Sharma Vs State of Raj and Ors.