Allowed

Chittarnath v. State

Rajasthan HC1 Dec 2018CRLMB/11977/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the petitioner, arrested for alleged supply of poppy husk under the NDPS Act, sought relief under Section 439 Cr.P.C. The High Court, noting the quantity was below commercial and a co-accused was on bail, granted bail by executing a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with a personal bond of Rs. 50,000 and two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each.

Chittarnath Vs State — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 11977/2018

¶3

Chittarnath S/o Shri Devanath, Aged About 35 Years, B/c Yogi, R/o Kerpura, P.s. Gangapur City, Bhilwara. (Presently Lodged At Sub Jail, Bali)

----Petitioner

Versus

State, Through Pp

----Respondent

For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Suresh Kumbhat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Bhati, P.P.

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI

¶10

Order

¶11

01/12/2018

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

¶13

The petitioner has been arrested in FIR No. 06/2017 of Police Station Khiwada, District Pali for the offences punishable under Sections 8/15, 29 of the NDPS Act. He has preferred this bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that allegation against the petitioner is to the effect that he has supplied 48 kg. of poppy husk to the co-accused person Sohan Ram, which is below commercial quantity. It is also submitted that co-accused person has already been enlarged on bail by this Court.

¶15

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application.

¶16

(2 of 2)

¶17

[CRLMB-11977/2018]

¶18

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶19

Accordingly, this bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Chittarnath S/o Shri Devanath shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No. 06/2017 of Police Station Khiwada, District Pali provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶20

(VIJAY BISHNOI),J

¶21

86-Taruna/-

Chittarnath v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chittarnath v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Monika Pandit Vs State

Manoj Vs State

Sukhdev Singh Vs State

Shahrukh Khan Vs State of Rajasthan

Ladu Lal @ Rahul Vs State of Rajasthan

Prakash Vs State