Prakash v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner. Court granted liberty to file a fresh bail application before the trial court after recording the statement of the Investigating Officer or Seizure Officer.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner granted liberty to file fresh bail application before the trial court after recording the statement of Investigating Officer/Seizure Officer.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 11971/2018
Prakash S/o Sh. Bagdu Ram, Aged About 27 Years, B/c Bishnoi, R/o Kanasar, Teh. Bhap, Dist. Jodhpur. (Lodged In Sub Jail, Suratgarh)
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pritam Solanki For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Bhati, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
01/12/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner, without arguing the matter on merits, has submitted that he does not want to press this criminal misc. bail application, however, seeks liberty for the petitioner to file fresh bail application before the trial court after recording of the statement of Investigating Officer/Seizure Officer.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the criminal miscellaneous bail application should be allowed when it is not pressed by the counsel.
Whether the petitioner should be granted liberty to file a fresh bail application before the trial court after recording of the statement of Investigating Officer/Seizure Officer.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Prakash S/o Sh. Bagdu Ram
- respondent
State, Through Pp
Coram
VIJAY BISHNOI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/11971/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court