The High Court rejected the petitioner's second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. holding that his identification in the TID parade and presence of criminal antecedents were fatal grounds for refusal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail No. 11855/2018
Sitaram@ Lala S/o Shri Nahar Singh B/c Meena, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Dorawali Police Station Todabhim Dist. Karauli Raj. (At Present Confined At Dist. Jail Karauli)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan Through Pp, Raj.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Malkhan Chaturvedi For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.R. Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Murari Lal, CI, SHO, PS, Lakhanpur, Bharatpur present in person
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI
Judgment / Order
03/11/2018
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-11855/2018]
application.
ensure that statement of Rajeev is recorded at the earliest.
(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Arun/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to second bail anticipating that a witness's erroneous omission from the FIR may be rectified by the Investigating Officer.
Sitaram @ Lala S/o Shri Nahar Singh B/c Meena
State Of Rajasthan Through Pp, Raj.
Pankaj Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
