An order where the High Court dismissed two criminal bail applications as not pressed by the petitioners, granting them liberty to file fresh applications later.
Applications dismissed as not pressed; liberty granted to file fresh applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 11040/2018
Ripudaman S/o Maman Singh, Aged About 22 Years, Chainpura Bada , Tehsil Ratan Nagar, Distt. Churu (Lodged At Distt. Jail Churu)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 10560/2018
Pratap Singh S/o Bajrang Singh Rajput, Aged About 35 Years, Village Dhodhaliya (Dist Jail Churu)
----Petitioner
Versus
State, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Bora, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Nishant Bora Mr. Shambhoo Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashok Upadhyay, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
27/11/2018
Learned counsel for the petitioners have submitted that they do not want to press these criminal misc. bail applications, however, seek liberty for the petitioners to file fresh bail application before the trial court after recording of the statements of bank employees viz. Ramniwas and injured Pawan Kumar.
(2 of 2)
[CRLMB-11040/2018]
Accordingly, these criminal misc. bail applications preferred by the petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are dismissed as not pressed with the liberty sought for.
(VIJAY BISHNOI),J
86-Taruna/-
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ripudaman
Pratap Singh
State Of Rajasthan
VIJAY BISHNOI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
