Held that third bail application is rejected with liberty to apply afresh after recording of witness statements.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail No. 10511/2018
Bhajna Ram S/o Sh. Joraram, Aged About 35 Years, B/c Vishnoi Panwar, Niwasi Ganv Bedo Ka Bera, Nosar, Tehsil Osiyan, Distt. Jodhpur (Lodged In Central Jail, Jodhpur)
----Petitioner
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahesh Bora, Sr. Advocate with Mr. H.D. Bishnoi For Respondent(s) : Mr. K.V. Vyas, Public Prosecutor
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.K. LOHRA
Order
18/12/2018
Heard learned Senior Counsel as well as learned Public
Prosecutor on this third bail application.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant any indulgence to the petitioner at this stage.
Resultanlty, this third bail application is rejected.
It is made clear that petitioner shall be at liberty to apply for
bail afresh after recording of statements of witness Naru Ram.
(P.K. LOHRA),J
84-T.Singh/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted in third bail application.
Bhajna Ram
State Of Rajasthan
P.K. Lohra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
