Single-paragraph order allowing S.B. Civil Misc. Application No.107/2018, clarifying that Advocate Mr. Avtar Singh Solanki appeared for respondent no.3 in the underlying appeal. No substantive legal principle articulated.
Clarification that Mr. Avtar Singh Solanki appeared for respondent no.3.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1 of 1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Application No.107/2018
IN
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 4544/2008
Mohan Lal
----Applicant
Versus
Anil Kumar & Ors.
----Respondents
__________________________________________ For Applicant : Mr. Mahendra Singh Kachhawa
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Order
24/04/2018
Heard.
Application is allowed for the reasons stated therein.
Order dated 15.03.2018, is clarified to the extent that Mr. Avtar Singh Solanki, Advocate had appeared on behalf of Mr. Mahendra Singh Kachhawa, counsel for respondent no.3.
(SABINA), J
Mohita/26
Mohan Lal
Anil Kumar & Ors.
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
