In a civil miscellaneous appeal, the High Court of Rajasthan dismissed the appeal against the Tribunal's order rejecting an insurance claim due to lack of evidence proving vehicular damage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 474/2000
Chandra Prakash, S/o Shri Banwari Lal Shrivastava, aged about 40 years, R/o Devra, District Etawa, U.P.
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondents
For Appellant(s) : Mr. R.P. Tiwari
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Judgment
10/07/2018
Appellant has filed this appeal, challenging the award dated 11.01.2000 passed by the Tribunal, whereby, claim petition filed by the appellant seeking compensation on account of damage caused to his Moped in the accident in question, was dismissed.
I have heard learned counsel for the appellant and have gone through the record available on the file carefully.
Learned Tribunal while declining the claim petition filed by the appellant has held that it was not established on record that the Moped of the appellant had been damaged in the accident in question. Appellant had failed to lead any evidence in support of his case.
In these circumstances, learned Tribunal has rightly dismissed the claim petition filed by the appellant.
(2 of 2)
[CMA-474/2000]
No ground for interference is made out.
Dismissed.
(SABINA),J
Sudha/01
Chandra Prakash
Dhola Ram
S. Gurdeep Singh
The New India Insurance Company Ltd.
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
