Notice in S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2775/2014. The appellant-defendant submitted the appeal filed, but respondents declined to argue. The court was directed to record the first appeal and pass orders if feasible.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
jktLFkku mPp U;k;ky; t;iqj ihB] t;iqj
vkns'k
S.B. CIVIL MISC APPEAL NO. 2775/2014
Jaipur Development Authority, through its Secretary, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur (Rajasthan).
Appellant-Defendant
Versus
RESPONDENT-PLAINTIFFS
-2-
(Rajasthan): at present residing at Kooli Khachariawas, Tehsil Data Ramgarh, District Sikar (Rajasthan) 7. State of Rajasthan; Through: Tehsildar, Tehsil Jaipur, District Jaipur (Rajasthan).
RESPONDENT-DEFENDANTS
vkns'k fnukad % 22-10-2018
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh cuokjhyky 'kekZ
Jh vfer dqMh] vf/koDrk&vihykFkhZ dh vksj lsA
izdj.k vkt vk{ksi la[;k&3 dh iwfrZ ds fy, lwphc) gqvk gS] fdUrq vf/koDrk vihykFkhZ us fuosnu fd;k gS fd os bl vihy ij cy ugha nsrs gSaA lkFk gh mUgksaus fuosnu fd;k gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; ds le{k ewy okn o"kZ 2009 ls yafcr gS vkSj mlesa vLFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk dk vkns'k tkjh fd;k gqvk gSA fooknxzLr lEifRr esa vihykFkhZ t;iqj fodkl izkf/kdj.k dh lEifRr fufgr gSA vr% v/khuLFk U;k;ky; dks ewy okn dk fuLrkj.k 'kh?kz djus gsrq funsZf'kr dj fn;k tkosA
mijksDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa ;g vihy bl izdkj fuLrkfjr dh tkrh gS fd v/khuLFk U;k;ky; fcuk fdlh vokafNr LFkxu fn;s 'kh?kzkfr'kh?kz ewy okn dk fuLrkj.k djs rFkk tgka rd laHko gks] izdj.k N% ekg esa fuLrkfjr dj fn;k tkosA
¼cuokjh yky 'kekZ½ U;k;kf/kifr
feRry@1
Jaipur Development Authority, through its Secretary
Bhanwar Singh
Smt. Top Kanwar
Smt. Kiran Kanwar
Digvijay Singh
Chandravir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
