Allowed

Mohan Singh v. Udai Chand and Others

Rajasthan HC12 Oct 2018CRES/53/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Justice Banwari Lal Sharma allowed the restoration application filed by Mohan Singh. The original S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 65/2016 was restored to its original number on the condition that the petitioner deposits Rs. 2,000 as costs before the State Legal Services Authority within two weeks.

What did the court decide?

Restoration of S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 65/2016 to original number subject to deposit of Rs. 2,000 as costs.

Mohan Singh Vs Udai Chand and Others — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Rajasthan HC (2018)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Civil Misc. Restoration Application No. 53/2018

¶3

¶4

S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 65/2016

¶5

Mohan Singh S/o Shri Narayan Singh, aged about 86 years, B/c Mali, R/o Village Amer, District Jaipur, At Present B-90 Anandpuri, Moti Dungari Road, Jaipur Rajasthan.

¶6

----Defendant No.1/Revision Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

Udaichand S/o Babulal B/c Mali, R/o Village Amer, District Jaipur Rajasthan.

¶9

Kamal S/o Babulal B/c Mali, R/o Village Amer, District Jaipur Rajasthan.

¶10

Moti Lal S/o Babulal, B/c Mali, R/o Village Amer, District Jaipur Rajasthan.

¶11

Hiralal S/o Babulal B/c Mali, R/o Village Amer, District Jaipur Rajasthan.

¶12

Yadram S/o Babulal B/c Mali, R/o Village Amer, District Jaipur Rajasthan.

¶13

–---Plaintiffs/Respondents

¶14

Al Mohammad S/o Fateh Mohammad, Caste Muslman, R/o S- 19,20,21 Near Beniwal Kanta, Krishana Colony, Ramgarh Moad, Amer Road, Jaipur (Rajasthan)

¶15

Siraj Mohammad S/o Fateh Mohammad Caste Muslman., R/o S-19,20,21 Near Beniwal Kanta, Krishana Colony, Ramgarh Moad, Amer Road, Jaipur Rajasthan

¶16

Afsar Mohammad S/o Fateh Mohammad Caste Muslman, R/o S-19,20,21 Near Beniwal Kanta, Krishana Colony, Ramgarh Moad, Amer Road, Jaipur Rajasthan

¶17

9.Imran Mohammad S/o Fateh Mohammad Caste Muslman., R/o S-19,20,21 Near Beniwal Kanta, Krishana Colony, Ramgarh Moad, Amer Road, Jaipur Rajasthan

¶18

Deputy Registrar Officer, Deputy Registrar Office Amer, District, Jaipur Rajasthan.

¶19

–--Proforma Respondents

¶20

(2 of 2)

¶21

[CRES-53/2018]

¶22

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Balkishan Saini For Respondent(s) : None present

¶23

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA

¶24

Order

¶25

12/10/2018

¶26

Even after service, no-one appeared on behalf of

¶27

respondents to oppose the restoration application.

¶28

Heard.

¶29

Considering the facts mentioned in the application and arguments advanced by learned counsel for the applicantpetitioner, the application is allowed and S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 65/2016 is restored on its original number; provided applicant deposits Rs. 2,000/- as cost before State Legal Services Authority within two weeks from today, failing which this application shall be deemed as dismissed.

¶30

(BANWARI LAL SHARMA),J

¶31

S. Kumawat/11

Mohan Singh v. Udai Chand and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohan Singh v. Udai Chand and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj State Road Transport Corporation through General Manager Vs Smt Rekha Devi W/O Late Sh. Rameshchand

Lali Devi Natural Guadian of Vishal Vs Gopal

Mukesh Kumar Sharma S/O Shri Kedar Mal Sharma Vs Smt. Lakha Devi W/O Shri Kameshwar Singh

Smt. Laxmi D/O Atar Singh B/C Jat Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rohit Suri S/O Shri Satyendra Nath Suri B/C Punjabi Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Bhag Chand@Ravi S/O Kailash Chand B/C Mali Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp