The High Court dismissed a civil miscellaneous appeal as infructuous on the ground that a compromise had been reached between the parties. No substantive legal principle was laid down in the order.
Appeal dismissed as infructuous due to compromise between parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 1649/2004
Nisar Ahmad S/o Shri Gulam Ahmad, by caste Muslim, aged about 56 years, R/o Nayapura, Ismail Chowk, Kota (Rajasthan)
----Applicant-Objector-Appellant
Versus
…...Decree Holder Respondent
----Judgment Debtor Respondent
| For Appellant(s) | : Mr. Shailesh Prakash Sharma |
|---|---|
| alongwith | |
| Mr. Ganesh Gupta | |
| For Respondent(s) | : Mr. R.P. Vijay |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH
Judgment
14/02/2018
Counsel for the appellant submitted that in view of the compromise between the parties, the present appeal has become infructuous.
In that view of the matter, the present appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(INDERJEET SINGH),J
Jyoti/27
Nisar Ahmad
Abdul Gaffar
Munna Khan
INDERJEET SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
