Scorning the factual details, the facts in brevity, giving rise of this appeal, are that on 7th of December, 2010, appellant while riding his motorcycle, collided with another motorcycle bearing registration No.RJ27/SG0240 (for short, ‘offending vehicle’) driven by one Nandlal and due to the accident, he suffered grave and serious injuries. As per version of the appellant, accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle. It is also pleaded in the petition that on account of accident, appellant suffered fracture of right tibia & fibula and was taken to hospital, wherein he remained as indoor patient for eight days and was operated. The appellant also stated in the claim petition that due to the injuries suffered by him he is facing great difficulty in his routine work and cannot remain in standing position for long duration. Appellant, in all, quantified total amount of compensation to the tune of Rs.5,41,000/-. For proving his case, appellant himself appeared in the witness box and also got exhibited Disability Certificate, issued by the Medical Board. Per contra, no oral evidence was tendered by respondents or insurance company. Learned Tribunal, upon examining available material, decided issue No.1 relating to rash and negligent driving in favor of appellant and against the respondents. Issue No.3 was settled on the basis of pleadings of insurance company but in absence of any evidence, same was adjudicated against it. While considering issue No.2 regarding quantum of compensation, learned Tribunal quantified compensation for injuries as well as pain and sufferings of the appellant to the tune of Rs.20,000/- and
