Petitioners filed a writ petition for restoration of pension rights. The High Court dismissed the restoration application as infructuous since the Committees of the Municipal Board had already been constituted, as admitted by the respondents' counsel.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Restoration No. 48 / 2016
Both resident of Merta City, District Nagaur, at present Ward Members of Municipal Board, Merta, District Nagaur (Raj.)
----Petitioners Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Purohit
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yashwant Mehta
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Judgment / Order
07/12/2017
Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the Committees of the Municipal Board, Merta City have already been constituted, hence, this restoration application has rendered infructuous.
(2 of 2)
Learned counsel for the petitioners is not in a position to
dispute the said fact.
In view of the statement made by Mr.Yashwant Mehta, learned counsel for the respondents, this restoration application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(VIJAY BISHNOI)J.
Ms rathore
Mahendra Kumar Sharma
Chhotu Lal Vaishnav
The State of Rajasthan
Director Cum Joint Secretary, Local Self Department
Municipal Board, Merta City
Vijay Bishnoi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
