This order directs State respondents to decide the petitioner's representation within eight weeks of receipt, referencing a prior coordinate bench judgment.
Direction to respondents to decide representation within eight weeks with a reasoned and speaking order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19881 / 2017
Sayed Nadeem Ali, Son of Zaheer Ali Sayed, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Mohalla Sayedan, Didwana, District Nagaur (raj.)
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Poonia/Mr. Anil Kumar For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Order
07/11/2017
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that the controversy raised in the instant writ application stands resolved in view of the adjudication made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Jagdish Bhanoda v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ petition Number 773/2009 , decided on 29th July, 2009.
It is further contended that for the present; the petitioner would be satisfied, if the State-respondents are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner, within a time frame, which he is ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter.
In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ
(2 of 2)
[CW-19881/2017]
proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation enclosing a copy of the order in the case of Jagdish Bhanoda (supra).
In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than eight weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.
With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ application stands disposed off.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.
SS/203
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petitioner is entitled to a representation regarding his benefit claim in light of the precedent set in Jagdish Bhanoda.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jagdish Bhanoda v. State of RajasthanRelied on¶14
Jagdish Bhanoda v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ petition Number 773/2009
Sayed Nadeem Ali
State of Rajasthan
Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Nagaur
Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Didwana
Veerendr Singh Siradhana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
