Disposed

Mahendra Singh v. State Education Department Ors.

Rajasthan HC7 Mar 2017CW/17738/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan, Bench at Jaipur, disposed of a writ petition seeking consideration of the petitioner's representation regarding employment benefits. The court directed the petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation referencing a Coordinate Bench order within two weeks. Respondents must decide it expeditiously within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation referencing a Coordinate Bench order within two weeks; respondents to decide within four weeks.

Mahendra Singh Vs State Education Department Ors. — Service and Employment | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B.Civil Writ Petition No. 17738 / 2016

¶3

Mahendra Singh S/o Ladu Ram, Aged About 48 Years, VPO Bojhla, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Rajasthan Through Its Principal Education Secretary, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur

¶7

The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner

¶8

The Director, Primary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner

¶9

The District Education Officer (primary), Hanumangarh, Rajasthan

¶10

The District Education Officer (Secondary), Hanumangarh, Rajasthan

¶11

----Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) :

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA

¶14

Judgment / Order

¶15

07/03/2017

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that for the present; the petitioner would be satisfied, if the Staterespondents are directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner, within a time frame, which he is ready and willing to address within two weeks hereinafter, in the backdrop of the order dated 3^rd October, 2016, made by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of Harishankar Verma v. The State of Rajasthan & Ors.: S.B. Civil Writ Petition no.12450/2016.

¶17

(2 of 2)

¶18

[CW-17738/2016]

¶19

In view of the limited prayer addressed; the instant writ proceedings are closed with a direction to the petitioner to address a comprehensive representation enclosing a copy of the order in the case of Harishankar Verma (supra).

¶20

In case, a representation is so addressed within the aforesaid period, the State-respondents are directed to consider and decide the same by a reasoned and speaking order as expeditiously as possible in accordance with law. However, in no case later than four weeks from the date of receipt of the representation along with a certified copy of this order.

¶21

With the observations and directions, as indicated above, the writ as well as stay application stand disposed off.

¶22

(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA)J.

¶23

SS/169

Mahendra Singh v. State Education Department Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahendra Singh v. State Education Department Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Yadav Vs State of Raj and Ors.

A C T O Ward II Circle B Alwar Vs M/S S S B Engineers Pvt. Ltd.

Mohammad Fazil Vs Rabia Rahim Khan and Anr.

Compotar Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Sitaram Bari Vs R H B and Ors.

Bhawani Singh Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp