Veer Singh v. Haridutt Sharma and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear and expressed lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner did not appear and expressed lack of interest in pursuing the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13477 / 2017
Veer Singh S/o Shri Girraj, by Caste Jat, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Rarah, Tehsil Kumher, District Bharatpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : None
For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N.BHANDARI
Order
18/08/2017
None appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition, though, the case was called twice in two different rounds. It seems that the petitioner is not interested to pursue this writ petition, hence, it is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(MN BHANDARI) J.
Preeti, PA/196
Veer Singh
Haridutt Sharma
Punjab National Bank Branch Rarah
M.N. Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court