Vinod Kumar and Anr. v. State and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B.Criminal Misc(Pet.) No. 2019 / 2013
- Vinod Kumar S/o Shri Brahmanand, B/c Sharma, R/o Hanumangarh Town, At present as Constable FC No.683, S.P. Office, District Hanumangarh (Raj.)
- Ram Pratap Verma S/o Shri Moman Ram, Aged about 43 years, R/o Village Birkali, Tehsil Nohar, District Hanumangarh (Raj.). At present posted as Assistant Sub Inspector Police Station Sadar, Hanumangarh.
----Petitioners
Versus
- State of Rajasthan
- Mukesh S/o Shri Devi Lal, R/o Village Kulchandra, Tehsil Tibbi, District Hanumangarh (Raj.)
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.S. Sandhu
For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Panwar - PP
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vinod Kumar
- petitioner
Ram Pratap Verma
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
- respondent
Mukesh
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMP/2019/2013
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court