Mukesh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Rajasthan High Court dismissed the petitioner's criminal bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. as it was explicitly indicated by the petitioner that they did not wish to press the application.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Third Bail No. 9285 / 2017
Mukesh S/o Sh. Shishpal, By Caste Meghwal, Resident of Ward No. 6, Dashmesh Colony, Kodiyanwali Puli, Purani Abadi, Sri Ganganagar District Sri Ganganagar. (At Present Lodged in Central Jail, Sri Ganganagar)
----Petitioner
Versus
The State of Rajasthan
----Respondent
_____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Matoria
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikram Singh Rajpurohit, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI
Order
01/11/2017
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to entertain a bail application that was not pressed by the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mukesh
- respondent
The State of Rajasthan
Coram
VIJAY BISHNOI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/9285/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court