Chtan Ram v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In a second bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the petitioner declined to press the application. The High Court dismissed the application as not pressed at the stage.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. I1 Bail No. 2427 / 2017
Chtan Ram S/o Mangala Ram,, By Caste Meghwal, Resident of Village Uchiyarda, Banar Police Station, Jodhpur, District Jodhpur. (Confined in Central Jail, Jodhpur)
Versus
State of Rajasthan
-6% ' .v
For etitioners) : Mr. B.S. Rathore
For Respondent(s) : Mr. O.P. Rathi, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI +-
Learned counsel f0.r .* !> +li).i . 'the .petitione:r :has submitted .. : that he .$ ? ; p I.' .* << ~'+' <&.iw ;.?p?* % LX does not want to pressd$bl.s ritfiinel..miSc~~: ;, _' second bail application &. t . .* ,+$ ' ' p:; .$ ?,,. at this stage.
Accordingly, this cri6inal t.." c;;, :.v 9 i kist. 3 . second .. bail application cq* 'G+.+. +., ,& " "" A=. ?' ' < $) ,F .,.a9 .-. ,.,-,w,~f G ! j' ,..PI, .y>referred by the petiti:on:er uii"d:er Sectson ;439 Cr.P.C. is dismissed :$ z by, > - as not pressed at this stage. -, L < '.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. can be dismissed if it is not pressed by the petitioner at the hearing.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Chetan Ram
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
Coram
Vijay Bishnoi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLMB/2427/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court