Allowed

Smt Shanta v. State

Rajasthan HC10 Mar 2017CRLMB/2308/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court of Rajasthan granted bail to two accused persons charged with offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, directing them to execute a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.306/2016 upon execution of a personal bond of Rs.50,000 with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000 each.

Smt Shanta Vs State — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR

¶2

S.B.Criminal Misc. Bail No. 2384 / 2017

¶3

Chhagan @ Chhagan Lal S/o Ravji, By Caste Katara Bheel, Resident of Paat Police Station Anandpuri District Banswara. (At Present Lodged in District Jail, Banswara).

¶4

----Petitioner

¶5

Versus The State of Rajasthan ----Respondent Connected With S.B.CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL No. 2308 / 2017 Smt. Shanta W/o Shri Shankar, By Caste Damor Bhil, Village Pat, Police Station Anandpuri, District Banswara (Raj.). (Lodged in District Jail, Banswara) ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan. ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rakesh Matoria

¶6

For Respondent(s) : Mr. Deepak Choudhary, PP

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY BISHNOI Judgment / Order

¶8

10/03/2017

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the material on record.

¶10

The petitioners have been arrested in FIR No.306/2016 of Police Station, Anandpuri, District Banswara for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC. They have preferred these bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶11

(2 of 2)

¶12

[CRLMB-2384/2017]

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the offences for which the petitioners have been charged are triable by the Magistrate.

¶14

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed these bail applications.

¶15

Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to grant bail to the accused petitioners under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

¶16

Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. are allowed and it is directed that petitioners Chhagan @ Chhagan Lal S/o Ravji and Smt. Shanta W/o Shri Shankar shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.306/2016 of Police Station, Anandpuri, District Banswara provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial court for his appearance before that court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial.

¶17

(VIJAY BISHNOI)J.

¶18

Gaurav

Smt Shanta v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt Shanta v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manju Devi Vs State and Ors.

Ashok Kumar Vs State

Nikhil @ Banti Vs State

Sonu Vs State

Sartaj Singh @ Taja Vs State

Smt Shanta Vs State