Allowed

Satya Narayan Khandelwal v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC30 Jan 2017CRLMB/1485/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the bail application of Satya Narayan Khandelwal accused in a narcotics FIR where the petitioner claimed false implication and investigation was complete. The court ordered release subject to furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000 and two surety bonds of Rs. 1,00,000 each without expressing a final opinion on merits.

What did the court decide?

The accused-petitioner shall be released on bail by furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs. 1,00,000/each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court.

Satya Narayan Khandelwal Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Narcotics (NDPS) | Rajasthan HC (2017)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR

¶2

S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1485 / 2017

¶3

Satya Narayan Khandelwal S/o Rudmal Khandelwal B/c Mahajan, R/o Patan, Tehsil Neemkathana, District Sikar. (At Present Lodged in the Sub Jail, Neemkathana, District Sikar).

¶4

----Accused-Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

State of Rajasthan Through P.P.

¶7

----Respondent

¶8

_____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashvin Garg

¶9

Public Prosecutor : Mr. Jitendra Shrimali

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BANWARI LAL SHARMA

¶11

Order

¶12

30/01/2017

¶13

The present Misc. bail application under section 439 Cr.P.C. is preferred by the Accused/ petitioner Satya Narayan Khandelwal in the matter of FIR No. 51/2016 registered at Police Station G.R.P. Neemkathana, District Sikar, for offences punishable under Sections 8/ 20 and 8/ 29 of N.D.P.S. Act.

¶14

Learned Counsel for petitioner Mr. Ashvin Garg submits that recovered contraband ganza is 14.100 kg which was recovered form co-accused Maniram who has already been released on bail by this Court, no recovery was effected from the present petitioner, he was implicated falsely in this matter only on information submitted by co-accused and the allegation levelled against the present petitioner is regarding 8/ 29 of N.D.P.S. Act.

¶15

(2 of 2)

¶16

[CRLMB-1485/2017]

¶17

Petitioner is in custody since 06.11.2016, investigation has been completed and charge-sheet has already been filed therefore, petitioner may be released on bail.

¶18

Learned Public Prosecutor Mr. Jitendra Shrimali opposed the bail application.

¶19

I have considered the submissions made at bar.

¶20

On consideration of submissions made on behalf of the respective parties and the material made available for my perusal, therefore without expressing any final opinion on the merit and de-merit of the case and considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the accused-petitioner Satya Narayan Khandelwal.

¶21

Consequently, the bail application filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed.

¶22

Therefore, it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Satya Narayan Khandelwal S/o Shri Rudmal Khandelwal in FIR No. 51/2016 registered at Police Station G.R.P. Neemkathana, District Sikar, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- and two surety bonds of Rs. 1,00,000/each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation to appear before the Trial Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.

¶23

(BANWARI LAL SHARMA)J.

¶24

Simple Kumawat/148

Satya Narayan Khandelwal v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satya Narayan Khandelwal v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Spark Plugs Vs

Praveen Kumar Jain Vs Rajendra Kumar Khandelwal

Rajveer Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Suman Devi Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Panchi and Ors. Vs State Revenu Departmentors

Jamil Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp