The Rajasthan High Court dismissed an S.B. Crml Leave to Appeal No. 34/2016 regarding a matter referred to arbitration under Section 5 Ifjlhek vf/kfu;e. The court held that the appellant had no reason or request to file the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
S.B. Crml Leave To Appeal No. 34 / 2016
Mohd. Hussain son of Shri Noor Mohammed, by caste Muslim, resident of Silawatwadi, Udaipur, District Udaipur.
----Appellant
Versus
----Respondent
;kph dh vksj ls vf/koDrk Jh lat; ekFkqj] Jh eukst ikjhd] yksd vfHk;kstd Jh ,y vkj mik/;k;] v;kph la[;k 2 ls 5 dh vksj ls vf/koDrk Jh iznhi 'kkg] mifLFkrA
ekuuh; U;k;kf/kifr Jh lanhi esgrk vkns’[email protected];
24@07@2017
lquk x;kA i=koyh dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA bl ekeys esa
vfHk;kstu }kjk ;kph ifjoknh dh vksj ls izLrqr ifjokn bLrxkls ds tfj,
LFkkfir fd;k x;kA fopkj.k U;k;ky; us v;kphx.k dks ckn vUoh{kk fu.kZ; fnukad 27-10-2015 ls nks"keqDr ?kksf"kr fd;k ftlls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr ;g vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk nl fnu vof/k ckf/kr gSA ;kph dh vksj ls nj[okLr vUrxZr /kkjk 5 ifjlhek vf/kfu;e ;g nsjh ekQ djus gsrq
izLrqr dh xbZ gSA nj[okLr esa ;g fy[kk x;k gS fd ;kph nwjLr xkao ds
(2 of 2)
[CRLLA-34/2016]
bykds esa jgrk gSA vr% vk{ksfir fu.kZ; dh tkudkjh mls ugha gks ikbZ ,oa le; ij vihy izLrqr ugha gks ikbZA
;kfpdk esa fn, x;s irs ds vuqlkj] ;kph us Lo;a dks flykoVokMh mn;iqj dk fuoklh gksuk crk;k gS tks fd fdlh Hkh lwjr esa xkao dk ugha gksdj mn;iqj 'kgj esa fLFkr gSA nj[okLr vUrxZr /kkjk 5 ifjlhek vf/kfu;e esa crk, x, dkj.k vlR; gSA vykok blds] eSaus vk{ksfir fu.kZ; dk voyksdu fd;kA rFkkdfFkr ?kVuk fnukad 31-03-1998 dh crkbZ tkrh gS tcfd bLrxklk nks eghus i’pkr fnukad 04-06-1998 dks izLrqr fd;k x;kA ;kph ifjoknh us vius bLrxkls ,oa lk{; esa ;g vkjksi yxk;k fd v;kphx.k vfHk;qDrx.k us mldh nqdku ds vUnj izos’k dj /kkfj;s] ryokjksa o yksgs ds lfj;s ls mlds lkFk ekjihV dh] ijUrq ifjoknh ds 'kjhj ij ,slh dksbZ pksV vkbZ gks ,slh dksbZ lk{; i=koyh ij izLrqr ugha djh xbZA bl rFkkdfFkr ?kkrd geys dh dk;Zokgh Hkh ifjoknh us nks ekg ds foyEc ls tfj, bLrxklk djhA eqLrxhl dgkuh izFke n`"V;k iw.kZr;k lansgizn ,oa >wBh izrhr gksrh gSA
mijksDr foospu ds vk/kkj ij] bl U;k;ky; dh jk; esa ;kph eqLrxhl dks vk{ksfir fu.kZ; fnukad 27-10-2015 ds fo:) vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk izLrqr djus dh vuqefr fn, tkus dk dksbZ vk/kkj@vkSfpR; ugha gSA
rnuqlkj ;g vihy vuqefr ;kfpdk nsjhuk gksus ds dkj.k rFkk lkjghu gksus ds vk/kkj ij fujLr dh tkrh gSA
¼lanhi esgrk½ U;k;kf/kifr
,l-,u-yksgjk@2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant is entitled to file a leave to appeal against the High Court's decision regarding a reference to arbitration.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohd. Hussain
The State of Rajasthan
Khalil
Ashraf
Iqbal
Sirajuddin
J. Lateef Ikram
J. Bhupesh Kuchelwar
J. Abdul Lateef
J. Yashwant Kanwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
