Rajvir Singh v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The single judge upheld the conviction for surpassing 304 Part-IIIPC but modified the sentence to the duration of the, period already undergone by the appellant, who argued for reduction due to the innocent
What did the court decide?
The sentence of imprisonment was reduced to the period already undergone by the appellant; conviction upheld.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B.CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 30/ 1994
Rajveer Singh Son of Padam Singh, by caste Rajput, Resident of Salimpur, Police Station Salimpur, District Sawai Madhopur. (At present in Sub-jail, Hindaun City)
Versus
The State of Rajasthan through P.P.
For appellant : Mr. Rinesh Gupta
For respondent : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Judgment / Order
03/01/2017
Appellant alongwith his co-accused had faced trial in FIR No. 115/1992 registered at Police Station, Salempur, District Sawai Madhopur qua commission of offences punishable under Sections 302, 323, 147, 148, 149 Indian Penal Code (herein after referred as IPC).
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant's conviction under Section 302 is sustainable given inconsistencies in prosecution evidence regarding the specific grievous injury.
Whether modification of the sentence qua imprisonment passed by the trial Court is warranted in a case of sudden fight.
Whether the appeal against conviction should be allowed or the sentence remitted to the period undergone.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Rajveer Singh
- respondent
The State of Rajasthan
Coram
Sabina
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLA/30/1994
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court