High Court dismissed the civil miscellaneous appeal filed by Reliance General Insurance Co Ltd against an accident compensation award, upholding the Tribunal's findings.
Appeal dismissed confirming the impugned judgment and award passed by the Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B.Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 2863 / 2015
Reliance Gen Insurance Co Ltd
----Appellant
Versus
Smt Geeta Devi And Others
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B.CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No. 3404 / 2015 Smt Geeta Devi And Others ----Appellant Versus Sharwan Singh And Others ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Appellant(s) : Mr.Virendra Agrawal For Respondent(s) : Mr.Gaurav Gupta
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA Judgment / Order
09/02/2017
This appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and award under appeal.
Brief facts of the case are that an accident occurred in the present case and with regard to an accident, a claim petition was filed on behalf of the claimant/s claiming compensation as mentioned therein. Notices were issued to the opposite parties. Reply to the claim petition was filed and the learned Tribunal framed the issues. After
(2 of 5)
[CMA-2863/2015]
hearing all the parties, the learned Tribunal passed the aforesaid impugned judgment & award under appeal.
Against the impugned judgment and award under appeal, the appellant preferred the instant appeal for the relief as prayed for in it.
Learned counsel for the appellant has contended that the learned Tribunal has failed to appreciate each and every aspect of the matter as also the evidence available on record. The award passed by the learned Tribunal is illegal, without jurisdiction and contrary to the facts of the case. Hence impugned award deserves to be modified/enhanced.
On the other hand, learned counsel for the respondents has opposed the submissions advanced on behalf of appellant and requested for maintaining/setting aside of award.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned judgment and award under appeal. I am in agreement with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal, which are reproduced as under:-
fook|d la[;k&1
mDr fook|dks dks lkfcr djus dk Hkkj izkFkhZx.k ij gSA
bl izdj.k esa tks lk{; izLrqr gqbZ gS ftlesa ,0MCyw01
(3 of 5)
[CMA-2863/2015]
Jherh xhrk nsoh dk dFku gS fd fnukad esjs ifr erd iwj.key ;kno fidvi ls ckulwj ls vthrx< pkjk Hkjdj ysdj vk jgs Fks tks fnukad 01-05-2012 dks le; lka;dky 4-40 cts ds yxHkx fd'ku fdxa gksVy ds ikl ,d Vªd ls fidvi nq?kZVukxzLr gks x;h Fkh ftlls mldh eR;q gks x;hA
ftjg esa xokg dk dFku gS fd eSaus nq?kZVuk gksrs gq, ugha ns[kh eS nq?kZVuk ds le; ekSds ij ugha FkhA--------
ftuds [k.Mu esa dksbZ lk{; chek dEiuh dh vksj ls is'k ugha dh gSA vr% ;kphx.k dh vksj ls is'k ekSf[kd o nLrkosth; lk{; dks ugha ekuus dk dksbZ dkj.k i=koyh ij fo|eku ugha gSA mDr nLrkostkr jktdh; vuqdze esa tkjh fd;s x;s gSa vkSj buds [k.Mu esa dksbZ lk{; is'k ugha dh xbZ gSA tSlk fd vkj,vkj 2009 ist 228 esa izfrikfnr fd;k x;k gS] ds fl}kar ls Hkh esjs er dh iqf"V gksrh gSA vr% rudh la- 1 o 2 dk fu.kZ; mijksDrkuqlkj izkFkhZx.k ds i{k esa fd;k tkrk gSA
fook|d la- 3
(4 of 5)
[CMA-2863/2015]
bl fook|d dks lkfcr djus dk Hkkj izkFkhZx.k ij gSA
bl lEca/k esa Jherh xhrknsoh dk dFku gS fd mDr nq? kZVuk ls iwoZ mldk ifr iwj.key 30 o"kZ dk g"Viq"V LoLFk fujksxh O;fDr Fkk tks fidvi ij [kyklh] df"k dk;Z] nqX/k O;olk;] i'kqikyu dk dk;Z dj 8]000@& :i;s ekfld vk; vftZr djrk Fkk rFkk viuk o vius ifjokj ij [kpZ djrk FkkA izkFkhZx.k erd ls feyus okyh vk; ls oafpr gks x;sA og vius ifr ls feyus okys I;kj] lgokl] nkEiR; lq[k ls oafpr gks x;h] izkFkhZ la[;k nks yxk;r N% vius firk ls feyus okys I;kj Lusg ls oafpr gks x;sA izkFkhZx.k dks Hkkjh ekufld 'kkjhfjd ihMk dk lkeuk djuk iM jgk gSA ----------
izkFkhZ la- 2 yxk;r 6 dks firk ds ekxZn'kZu o izse Lusg oapuk gsrq izR;sd dks 5]000&5]000: dqy 25]000: fnyok;k tkuk U;k;ksfpr gS ,oa izkFkhZ la[;k lkr o vkB e`rd ds ekrk firk gS ftudks vius iq=Lusg oapuk dh en esa izR;sd dks 5000@& :i;s ds fglkc ls dqy 10]000@& :i;s fn;k tkuk mfpr ik;k tkrk gS rFkk vfUre laLdkj dh en esa 5000@& :i;s fn;k tkuk mfpr ik;k tkrk gSA
(5 of 5)
[CMA-2863/2015]
bl izdkj ls vkosndx.k mijksDr izdj.k esa dqy izfrdj jkf'k 11]03]560 :- gksrh gSA tks foi{kh la-1 yxk;r 3 la;qDr% o i`Fkdr% izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh ik;ks tkrs gSaA 'ks"k rF;ksa ckcr~ ;kfpdk esa dh xbZ izkFkZuk fdlh izdkj dh dksbZ rF;kRed lk{; u gksus ds dkj.k mDr rF; lk{; vHkko esa lkfcr ugha ik;s tkrs gSaA
Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case and the findings arrived at by learned Tribunal as quoted herein above, the learned Tribunal is found to have dealt with each and every aspect of the matter, and has rightly passed the impugned judgment and award. I am in unison with the findings arrived at by the learned Tribunal. Hence, I do not think it just and proper to interfere with the impugned award under appeal passed by the Tribunal, and thus the appeal having no force, is hereby dismissed after confirming the judgment and award under appeal passed by the learned Tribunal.
Sandeep/-428-429
Reliance Gen Insurance Co Ltd
Smt Geeta Devi And Others
MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
