A contempt petition challenging non-compliance of a court order was dismissed. The respondents produced documents proving compliance, leading to the discharge of contempt notices and disposal of the petition.
Notices of contempt discharged; contempt petition disposed of; compliance found established.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 935 / 2017
Mahesh Chandra Agarwal S/o Late Sh. Baij Nath Agarwal, Aged About 68 Years, R/o Plot No. 33, Venketeshwar Colony, Sodala, Jaipur
----Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr Manoj Pareek
For Respondent(s) : Mr JK Singhi, Sr Advocate with Mr Saurabh Jain
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.N. BHANDARI
Order
07/12/2017
It is stated by learned counsel for respondents that
order for compliance of the order of this court has been passed. The documents are produced in the court, which are taken on record. Accordingly, finding compliance, notices of contempt are discharged and the contempt petition is disposed of.
(M.N. BHANDARI)J.
bnsharma
Mahesh Chandra Agarwal
Sanjay Malhotra
Shreemat Pandey
R.G. Gupta
M.N. Bhandari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
