The High Court of Rajasthan Bench at Jaipur disposed of connected civil contempt petitions. The court found that the impugned order was partially complied with, allowing revivals upon further application.
The contempt petitions were dismissed and the notices were discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B.Civil Contempt Petition No. 1258 / 2016
Lavlesh Kumar Baroliya
----Petitioner
Versus
Shri Naresh Pal Gangwal And Others
----Respondent
Connected With
S.B.CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION No. 735 / 2016 Vinod Kumar Regar And Others ----Petitioner Versus Shri Naresh Pal Gangwar And Others ----Respondent S.B.CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION No. 749 / 2016 Dharmraj Shakyawal ----Petitioner Versus Shri Naresh Pal Gangwar And Others ----Respondent S.B.CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION No. 892 / 2016 Ram Naresh ----Petitioner Versus Shri Naresh Pal Gangwar And Others ----Respondent S.B.CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION No. 893 / 2016 Vijendra Kumar Meena ----Petitioner Versus
(2 of 3)
[CCP-1258/2016]
Shri Naresh Pal Gangwar And Others
----Respondent
S.B.CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION No. 906 / 2016 Jai Prakash
----Petitioner Versus
Shri Naresh Pal Gangwar And Others
----Respondent S.B.CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION No. 1259 / 2016 Jagdish
----Petitioner Versus
Shri Naresh Pal Gangwar And Others
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.K. Chaturvedi, Ms. Raj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Gupta, AAG Mr. S.N. Kumawat
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA Order
07/03/2017
Mr. S.K. Gupta AAG and Mr. SN Kumawat, Advocate are present for the respondents-contemnors. They have contended that the impugned order has been complied with.
Ms. Raj Sharma and Mr. M.K. Chaturvedi, who are present for the petitioners have contended that the order has been partially complied with.
(3 of 3)
[CCP-1258/2016]
If it is so, the petitioners are at liberty to file an application for revival of the contempt petition.
The aforesaid contempt petitions stand dismissed and the notices stand discharged.
(MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA)J.
Dk
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order came under contempt proceedings has been complied with?
Lavlesh Kumar Baroliya
Shri Naresh Pal Gangwal
Others
Mahesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
