Kailash Chand Meena v. Shri Naresh Pal Gangwar and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioned for civil contempt against respondents. Court observed legal aid was dispensed and dismissed the petition. However, petitioner's dissatisfaction with compliance was noted, and liberty to file a fresh writ petition was granted.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition dismissed; liberty granted to file fresh writ petition.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B.Civil Contempt Petition No. 1092 / 2016
Kailash Chand Meena
Versus
Shri Naresh Pal Gangwar And Others
q:+
For Petitioner(s) ,t' :. " -MW, F$PSaini A, $.<., " .-! 1 "'I I. i; - ; ; ". ! fn" -8, - il .., ..&: >. .,F ' .,
L.
For esond"tt& . .,-%,,, + "P' : 'Mr. SK Gupta AAG 1 5
%>, . [., i
.. . a.
.z
, *' ,
HQN'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA
-...
-.J'
Judgment / Order
23/02/2017 ,+. -* - '$+ti c.- I ,, , &,,'- fi> .;c"[ .-A 7- $3 , 4. < Learned cou'nfiv6iP$$,;jf'~e.x-,r;;~~:~p,espondent/s ; k,,m-....e Tj , ; .* ,l?; . _ , yi::_ , '$3 ; 2- ,.# , ,j , &..,* has .,, 9, j2,&y5.,!$.fi:t, . .,$ < .v~,"$;:$,?.*~ 5 ; s ubmi tted that ., .<GDm~fiy&n~e.Y.~ ,+z+"~_ **_>!-.A a*. <~kt& !?;,.,Pbc>** :.., 5 3% , e ;'( ,I, 'k.'df"' :, iLVry-,4 -.:;&.%he order &-$+2 under ; . ;-; 2 cge..2k,"$,2h .$ .,, .h 4;3::$j;f. . Fc (, ,<'?;,:? -: "..\ q - r"y;l ,. -,st. ..i',.$Jji; :<%*i_ : _ir_ c 0 n t em p t h as be :$'&d'g?ire?$+, ,, _Kfi:>.$ ,* .;b; :*,.9 p $"&L" ., iA:L.& i;$~$.'&jlu,p r;.:d:E%+ "? !fld4# '$.T# ,,,/,$ $,..$$ s d,.?P.; ..' -':.-~ ' In view of the~st'?ftemen:made by the , , ,A, ,, ;- . 7. .* 9 , ,, ~$:3?~2;?L learned ". \ij 1:: i" counsel for the res@ndejntk$j+ +he contempt petition i s di smi ssed. ~ul e d$.,scharg&d : A,‘&p ,&j .. ..'. ..$I :,id .! ,');,:, li 9 .:" '! 8 g>,w.: , . ,p,c. ,., 17,tr-..'. :?%I, ,' '-$---:: pg7j:,5&di$t $,*;;;rz:qy.?h<. "A!<? ;& However, the I k p&;tqrer5.;?:a$.!?-'&t .fr .% ti. ..s.-i .. 1 . 7 - liberty to file fresh writ peti tiqq , ?. - ..$ -I fi'-:;he"?i-is not sati sfi ed with the compl i an ce made b$;izjh ;. p,:y- ..,- :-r$g:pan,de,n;z;s-, $& .&&;::<>;$; ,! 4.. _:-:5,_ w4-&A.&.&-:+:.*
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition can be dismissed after legal aid was dispensed under Section 520 Civil Contempt Act, 1931.
Whether a fresh writ petition will be allowed given the petitioner's dissatisfaction with the compliance by the respondents.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Kailash Chand Meena
- respondent
Shri Naresh Pal Gangwar
Coram
Mahesh Chandra Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- CCP/1092/2016
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court