Allowed

Tej Singh v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC25 Oct 2016SOSR/495/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed an application for suspension of sentence and ordered that the execution of the awarded sentence remain suspended during the pendency of the revision petition, conditioned on the furnishing of a personal bond and two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Execution of sentence awarded by trial and appellate courts suspended during pendency of revision petition, conditional on surety bond.

Tej Singh Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Rajasthan HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

SB Criminal Misc. Suspension for Sentence Application No. 495/2016

¶3

¶4

SB Criminal Revision Petition No.1709/2016

¶5

Tej Singh son of Shri Bhanwar Singh, by caste Rajput, aged 50 years, resident of Village Thikariya, Police Station Ringus, District Sikar (Raj.)

¶6

(At present in Sub Jail Neem Ka Thana, Sikar)

¶7

....Accused petitioner

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Rajasthan through PP

¶10

...Respondent Date of Order :: 25^th October, 2016

¶11

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

¶12

Mr. Sultan Singh Kuri, counsel for the petitioner Mr. Rishi Raj Singh PP for the State

¶13

This application for suspension for sentence

¶14

has been filed by the petitioner(s) under Section 397 readwith 401 CrPC along-with the revision petition.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) has contended that the accused petitioner(s) is/are behind the bars . He has further contended that accused petitioner(s) was/were on bail during trial as well as during the pendency of appeal. He has annexed the Certificate under Rule 311 (3) of High Court Rules to this effect and has prayed that in this view of the matter, this suspension of sentence application should be allowed and execution

¶16

¶17

of sentence awarded to the petitioner(s) should be suspended during the pendency of the revision petition. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed same. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the respective parties and carefully perused the entire material available on record, this suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to accused petitioner(s) Tej Singh S/o Shri Bhanwar Singh, by the trial court vide judgment dated 6.4.2013 passed in Cr. Case No. 329/2011 and affirmed by the appellate court vide judgment dated 31.8.2016 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 19/2013, shall remain suspended during the pendency of the revision petition, provided he/she/they furnish(es) a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,000/- (Rs. Two Lakh) together with two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh) each, to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he/she/they shall appear before this Court on 25^th November, 2016 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.

¶18

(Mahesh Chandra Sharma) J.

¶19

¶20

Tej Singh v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tej Singh v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Har Sahay Meena Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Dashrath Singh Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Dashrath Singh Vs State of Rajasthan and Anr.

Motilal Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Dinesh Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Satyendra Kumar Vs Shyam Lal Gurjar and Anr.