The High Court dismissed a contempt petition as infructuous following a counsel for the petitioner's statement that compliance with the earlier order had been made, and discharged the notices issued to respondents.
Contempt petition dismissed as infructuous and notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the ~igh Court of Judicature for
S. B. Ci vi 1 Contempt ~eti ti on NO. 394/2016 in S. B. ~i vi 1 writ ~eti ti on NO. 6656/2015 Satyendra I<umar vs. ~hri shyam ~al Gurjar & Anr.
~ear,n,Gd counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at Bar that compliance with the order has since been made.
In view of above statement, the contempt peti ti on is di smi ssed as having become i nf ructuous . Noti ces i ssued to the respondents contemnors stand di scharged .
Satyendra Kumar
Chhishyam Dal Gurjar
MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
