Learned counsel for respondents submits that petitioners were appointed on probation. Their services during the probation were not found satisfactory thus, terminated. It is as per terms of appointment order and Clause 13(ii) of the Jaipur City Transport Services Limited Workers standing orders (for short "the standing orders"). As per terms of appointment and Clause 13(ii) of the standing orders, service of a probationer can be terminated at any point of time. If it is assumed that orders of termination are based on the allegations, yet inquiry is not required to be conducted as per terms of appointment and the standing orders. In light of the aforesaid, the court may not interfere in the impugned orders. A reference of the judgments of the Apex Court in the cases of Oil and Natural Gas Commission & Ors. Vs. Dr. Md. S. lskender ALi, reported in (1980) 3 SCC 428 and Commodore Commanding, Southern Naval Area, Cochin Vs. V.N. Rajan, reported in (1981) 2 SCC 636 has been given. It is to show that Article 311 of the Constitution of India is not applicable in the present case. In view of the above, this court may not interfere in the orders impugned herein. The alternative prayer of learned counsel for respondents is that if orders of termination are set aside, a liberty may be given to take action against , the petitioners in
