Prem Lata v. State and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
This writ petition challenged a Board of Revenue order allowing use of land on cash security. The Court noted a related appeal had been pending for nine years. It directed the Revenue Appellate Authority to decide the appeal within four months and maintained the status quo until then, modifying the impugned order.
What did the court decide?
Direction to Revenue Appellate Authority to hear and decide the pending appeal within four months; direction to parties to maintain status quo.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.3288/2007
- Prem Lata, aged 70 years, daughter of Shri Chhitar Mal, wife of Shri late Mahesh Prakash, Brahmin by caste, resident of 100/78, Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Jaipur.
- Dayawati, Aged 80 years, daughter of Shri Chhitar Mal, Wife of Shri O.P, Sharma, Brahmin by caste, resident of C-5A/127, Janakpuri, New Delhi, through her Power of Attorney holder Smt. Premlata.
....Petitioners.
Versus
- State of Rajastahn, through the Secretary in the Department of Revenue, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
- The Board of Revenue for Rajasthan, Ajmer.
- Ajay Kumar son of Kishan Chand.
- Meena Kumari wife of Sujay Kumar.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should direct the Revenue Appellate Authority to expedite the pending appeal regarding the use of disputed land.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Prem Lata
- petitioner
Dayawati
- respondent
State of Rajasthan
- respondent
Board of Revenue for Rajasthan, Ajmer
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CW/3288/2007
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court