Coordinate Bench order in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 2753/2016 disposed of the petition by directing petitioner to submit a detailed representation to appropriate authority for adjudication within eight weeks following the ratio of Jagdish Bhanoda.
Petitioner directed to submit detailed representation to authority; authority to decide within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
O R D E R
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.2753/2016 [AZIM KHAN VS. STATE & ORS.]
Date of order
:
08.03.2016
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JAISHREE THAKUR
Mr.Dilip Sharma} Mr.Manish Tak} for the petitioner. Mr.Manish Patel Government Counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the controvesy involved in the instant writ petition is squarely covered by an order passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in a bunch of writ petitions led by S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3141/2015 (Jagdish Chandra Khatik & Ors. Vs. State Of Rajasthan & Ors.) which came to be decided on 03.04.2015, in the light of the judgment dated 29.07.2009 rendered in Jagdish Bhanoda Vs. State Of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.773/2009) which has subsequently been affirmed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondents does not dispute this position.
Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of requiring the petitioner to submit a detailed representation to the appropriate authority for adjudication of his grievance along with a copy of this order. Upon filing of such representation, the appropriate authority shall objectively consider and decide the same in light of the ratio of the judgment rendered by this Court in Jagdish Bhanoda (Supra) by passing a reasoned and speaking
2
order within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of such representation. In case the petitioner is found entitled to any monetary benefit, the same shall be released to him immediately. In case, any grievance, survives to the petitioner, he shall be at liberty to approach this Court.
With these directions, the above noted writ petition stands disposed of.
(JAISHREE THAKUR),J.
Mamta
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the instant writ petition image does now receive a disposition in terms of the ratio established in Jagdish Chandra Khatik & Ors Vs State Of Rajasthan (2015)._30_4
Whether the appropriate authority shall objectively consider and decide the petitioner Grievance within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Jagdish Chandra Khatik & Ors. Vs. State Of Rajasthan & Ors.Distinguished¶11
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3141/2015 (Jagdish Chandra Khatik & Ors. Vs. State Of Rajasthan & Ors.)
Jagdish Bhanoda Vs. State Of Rajasthan & Ors.Explained¶11
Jagdish Bhanoda Vs. State Of Rajasthan & Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.773/2009)
Azim Khan
State
Jaishree Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
