Petitioners counsel submitted the writ petition had become infructuous. The court dismissed the petition accordingly and closed the stay and interim applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
O R D E R
S.B. CIVIL WRIT PETITION NO.14292/2014
PETITIONERS
Versus
RESPONDENTS
Date of Order :: 15.9.2016
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Mr. Saransh Saini, for the petitioners. Mr. Bharat Vyas, for the respondents.
2
******
Learned counsel for the petitioners, under instructions, submits that the matter has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed for having become infructuous.
Stay application as well as interim application (61607/2014) under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, stand closed.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA), J.
Ashu /Jr.P.A./37
Smt. Neelam Suiwal
Sitaram Suiwal
The Jaipur Development Authority
The Divisional Commissioner
The Enforcement Officer Zone-4
VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
