A writ petition filed by an accused confined in prison holder became infructuous due to change in circumstance, leading to the closure of the proceedings by the High Court of Rajasthan.
The writ proceedings stand closed as the matter has become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13551/2014
TULSHI RAM SON OF SHRI BODU RAM BY CASTE KUMAWAT, RESIDENT OF PLOT NO.78A, RITU NAGAR VISHTAR, KALWAR ROAD, P.S. KARDHANI, JAIPUR (RAJASTHAN) (AT PRESENT CONFINED IN CENTRAL JAIN – JAIPUR.)
PETITIONER
THROUGH HIS WIFE : NORTI DEVI WIFE OF SHRI TULSHI RAM AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, BY CASTE KUMAWANT, RESIDENT OF PLOT NO.78A, RITU NAGAR VISHTAR, KALWAR ROAD, P.S. KARDHANI, JAIPUR (RAJASTHAN)
VERSUS
2.THE SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL JAIL, JAIPUR.
....RESPONDENTS
Date of Order :: 19.09.2016
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA
Mr. Lakhan Singh Tomar for petitioner.
<><><>
Mr. Lakhan Singh Tomar, under the instructions, submits that the matter has become infructuous.
Consequently, the writ proceedings stand closed in view of the statement made for the petition has become infructuous.
(VEERENDR SINGH SIRADHANA), J.
Item No.67 Solanki Sunil
Tulshi Ram Son of Shri Bodu Ram
Norti Devi Wife of Shri Tulshi Ram
State of Rajasthan
The Superintendent, Central Jail, Jaipur
Veerendr Singh Siradhana
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
