In S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.1530/2016, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted lack of instructions, leading the court to dismiss the petition for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
S.B. CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION NO.1530/2016
Dr. Anita Malik W/o Dr. Devendra Kumar, R/o 604, Park Royal Apartment, P.N.80 Near Hankonk Bazar, Sector-56 Gurgaon, P.S. Sector-56 Haryana
Accused-Petitioner
Versus
Respondents
Complainant-Respondent
DATE OF ORDER : : 7th September, 2016
**HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMAD RAFIQ *********
Shri Sanjay Sharma for the petitioner. Shri Alladin Khan, P.P. for the State. ##
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he
has no instructions in this matter.
The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Mohammad Rafiq),J.
RS/34
Dr. Anita Malik W/o Dr. Devendra Kumar
State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor
Director General of Police Rajasthan, Jaipur
Complainant-Respondent
MOHAMMAD RAFIQ
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
