Allowed

Panna Lal @ Vijendra Kumar v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rajasthan HC23 Sept 2016CRLA/894/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Special Criminal Appeal arose from dismissal of bail application. High Court allowed the appeal, directing release of the appellant on bail with a personal bond and two sureties under Section 14A (2) of the SC/ST Act.

What did the court decide?

Direction to release the accused on bail under Section 14A (2) of the SC/ST Act furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 2,00,100 and two sureties of Rs. 1,00,000 each.

Panna Lal @ Vijendra Kumar Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp — Caste Atrocities | Rajasthan HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN . AT JAIPUR BENCH

¶3

ORDER

¶4

S.B.CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 894/2016

¶5

Panna Lal @ Vijendra Kumar vs. State of Rajasthan ..... DATE OF ORDER . .. . . .. . . . .

¶6

..... . .. . . .. . . . . 23/9/2016

¶7

HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

¶8

Mr. Anit Upman , for the appellant/s.

¶9

Mr. Rishi Raj Singh, Public Prosecutor for State.

¶10

This appeal has been filed under Section 14A (2) of SC/ST Act against the order dated 20/8/2016 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act Cases, Jaipur whereby the bail application filed by the appellantls haslhave been dismissed.

¶11

Brief facts of the case are that an FIR No. 275/2016 was registered at P.S. Chaksu, Jaipur for the offences mentioned therein. During the course of investigation, the accused appellant/s was/were arrested. Thereafter he/she/they moved the bail application before the trial court, who vide impugned order dismissed the same. Hence this appeal has been filed on behalf of the appellant.

¶12

Learned counsel for the appellant/s has contended that the coaccused Chhaju Ram has already been enlarged on bail and the case of the petitioner is on better footing. Appellant/s islare in judicial lockup since long and the conclusion of the trial will take time, hence the accused appellant/s should be released on bail.

¶13

On the other hand, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the submissions advanced on behalf of learned counsel for the appellant.

¶14

Therefore, this appeal is allowed and it is directed that accused appellant/s Panna Lal @ Vijendra Kumar son of Shri Jagdish shall be released on bail under Section 14 A (2) of SC/ST Act in connection with afore-mentioned FIR provided he/she/they furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.2,001000/together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial court with the stipulation that he/she/they shall appear before that court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do SO.

¶15

[MAR'ESH CHANDRA SHARMA)J.

Panna Lal @ Vijendra Kumar v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Panna Lal @ Vijendra Kumar v. State of Rajasthan through Pp

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Shanti Devi Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Prakash @ Lala Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rahim and Anr. Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Dimpi and Ors. Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Soram Alias Shoram and Others Vs Sukha Ram and Others

Kamlya Sansi Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp