This single-paragraph order grants anticipatory bail to a student petitioner in an F.I.R. regarding possession of liquor, directing him to join investigation and not leave the country without permission.
Petition allowed; petitioner admitted to bail if arrested, subject to satisfaction of the Arresting Officer.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 11675/2016
Vinod Kumar Meena S/o Shri Arjun lal Meena B/c Meena R/o Village and post Madhogarh, Tehsil Bassi Police Station Tunga District Jaipur.
Versus.
State of Raj. through P.P.
Date of Order: September 15, 2016
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA,J.
Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar, for the petitioner. Mr. R.R. Gurjar, P.P. for the State.
Petitioner has filed this petition under Section 438 Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking anticipatory bail in F.I.R. No.44/20152016 registered at Police Station Excise, Chaksu District Jaipur, for offence under Section 16/54 of Rajasthan Excise Act,1975.
Heard.
Petitioner was not arrested at the spot. Petitioner is stated to be a student at the relevant time. Liquor-in-question was taken in possession.
Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, it would be just and expedient to order the release of the petitioner on bail.
Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this petition is allowed. In the event of arrest, petitioner be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the Arresting Officer. Petitioner shall join investigation as and when required by the police and shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. Petitioner shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(SABINA),J.
Mohita/21
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail is maintainable in a case involving alleged offences under the Rajasthan Excise Act, 1975.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Vinod Kumar Meena
State of Raj.
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
