Court dismissed the second bail application as infructuous due to the petitioner's counsel stating the application had become meaningless.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR
O R D E R
S.B.Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No.10422/ 2016
Suresh Kumar Mehta S/ o Late Shri Bal Krishna Mehta @ Bhagw an Das Mehta, R/ o A-3/ 905, Royal Green Apartment, Sirsi Road, Jaipur
….Petitioner
Versus State of Rajasthan through Public Prosecutor, Central Bureau of I nvestigation, Jaipur
…..Respondent Date of Order ::: 16.09.2016
HON'BLE MR. JUSTI CE PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL
Mr. Satish Pachori, for the petitioner. Mr. Ashvni Kumar Sharma, Special PP For CBI.
Learned Counsel for the petitioner states that the present bail
application has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made above, the second bail
application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL), J
Jyoti/S.No.48
SURESH KUMAR MEHTA
STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
PRASHANT KUMAR AGARWAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
