The High Court of Rajasthan disposed of the contempt petition after the applicant's counsel argued it became infructuous due to payment made to the petitioner. No substantive legal principles were discussed.
The application was disposed of as it became infructuous upon payment to the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JAIPUR BENCH JAIPUR
S.B.CIVIL Misc. Appl. No. 451/2015. In
S.B. Contempt Petition No. 984/2015.
(Jagdish Prasad Tawri & Anr. Vs. Pawan Kumar Goyal & Anr.)
DATE OF ORDER : 04/2/2016
HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK SHARMA
Mr. LS Shekhawat, for the applicant.
Mr Inderjeet Singh, AAG for respondents..
Counsel for the applicant submits that this application has
been rendered infructuous in view of the fact that payment has
been made to the petitioner.
The application is accordingly disposed of.
(ALOK SHARMA),J.
/gandhi 59
All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being e-mailed Brij Mohan Gandhi Sr.P.A. Cum JW
Jagdish Prasad Tawri & Anr.
Pawan Kumar Goyal & Anr.
Alok Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
