Partly allowed

Poonam Panjwani v. Phool Kha and Others

Rajasthan HC30 May 2016CMA/4365/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Rajasthan allowed the civil miscellaneous appeal partly, quashing the Tribunal's award on issue no. 4 for not considering objections and passing judgment arbitrarily. It remanded the matter for fresh decision.

What did the court decide?

Impugned award on issue no. 4 quashed and set aside; matter remanded to Tribunal for fresh decision after notice and hearing.

Poonam Panjwani Vs Phool Kha and Others — Rajasthan HC (2016) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT

¶2

JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR.

¶3

J U D G M E N T

¶4

S.B.Civil Misc. Appeal No.4365/2012 Smt. Poonam Panjwani

¶5

Vs Phool Kha and ors

¶6

DATE OF JUDGMENT : 30/05/2016

¶7

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA

¶8

Mr. K. N. Tiwari for appellant. Mr. Rishipal Agrawal respondents

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the parties and after hearing both the parties, the appeal is being disposed of at this stage.

¶10

Brief facts of the case are that this appeal has been filed against the impugned judgment and award passed by the concerned tribunal.

¶11

At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant/s submits that the learned Tribunal while passing the impugned award has not taken into consideration the objections which he has raised by way of aforesaid appeal. The finding of learned Tribunal on issue no/s. 4 is contrary to the material available on record. Thus, the impugned award passed by the learned Tribunal qua issue no/s. 4 be quashed and set aside and the matter be remanded to the learned Tribunal with the direction to decide the matter afresh in the light of objections which he has raised by way of aforesaid appeal.

¶12

On the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent/s though opposed the same but requested that the learned Tribunal may be directed to hear him/them at the time of deciding the matter afresh on the aforesaid issue/s, and he may be permitted to raise all the objections, grounds as have been raised in this appeal.

¶13

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and carefully perused the relevant material on record including the impugned award.

¶14

In my considered view, the learned Tribunal while passing the impugned award has not gone through the facts of the case and passed the impugned award surreptitiously. Thus, the impugned award passed by the learned Tribunal needs interference by this court.

¶15

In the result, the appeal is partly allowed and the impugned judgment and award passed by learned Tribunal qua on issue No/s. 4 is quashed and set aside with the direction to the learned Tribunal to decide the matter afresh as early as possible, qua issue no/s. 4 in the light of grounds raised by the learned counsel for the parties in the aforesaid appeal and the aforesaid judgment, if applicable and other judgments to be cited by learned counsel for the parties, if any, after issuing notice to all the concerned parties and giving opportunity of hearing to them.

¶16

Both the parties request for specific date for appearing before the trial court, hence they are directed to appear before the learned Tribunal on 19/9/2016.

¶17

Record, if any, be sent back.

¶18

(MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA)J.

¶19

Sandeep/-284

¶20

All corrections made in the judgment/order have been incorporated in the judgment/order being e-mailed. SANDEEP RAWAT,P.S.

Poonam Panjwani v. Phool Kha and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Poonam Panjwani v. Phool Kha and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prem Chand Arora Vs Manraj Gurjar and Others

Arg Housingh Pvt. Ltd. Vs ------------------------------

Umesh Kumar Sharma Vs Mrs Veenu Gupta and Others

R S R T C Vs Laxmi and Ors.

Muphal Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp

Rukmuddin Vs State of Rajasthan through Pp