Bhula v. Shankar Lal
Case brief
What is this about?
Allowed the restoration application and restored the appeal due to condoned delay. Directed the Tribunal to reinvestigate the claim case and decide afresh if facts are true, or allow withdrawal, leading to confirmation of the impugned award.
What did the court decide?
Allowed restoration of appeal. Directed Tribunal to reinvestigate matter within specified timeline and provide further directions for further proceedings.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JAIPUR BENCH, JAIPUR.
S.B. Civil Misc. Restoration Application no. 181/ 2016 In S.B. CIVIL MISC. APPEAL NO. 1964/ 2009
- Smt. Bhula, Widow of Rajaram, aged about 37 years, 2. Maya Ram, son of Late Rajaram, aged about 12 years, minor through his mother and natural guardian Smt. Bhula,
- Ram dev, Son of Kori Lal, aged about 67 years, All by caste Meena, residents of Baiji ki Kothi, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur.
- Smt. Dhapu, wife of Ram dev, aged about 57 years, by caste Meena, resident of village Achnera, Tehsil and District Tonk (Raj.)
.....Claimants/ Appellants
Versus
- Shankar Lal, son of Ladu Ram Tank, resident of Kho Nagoriyan, Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur. 2. United India Insurance Company Ltd., Transport Nagar, Jaipur through it's Manager.
....... Non-Claimants/ Respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT : 3/11/2016
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the restoration application should be condoned.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Smt. Bhula & Ors.
- respondent
Shankar Lal & Ors.
Coram
Mahesh Chandra Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Rajasthan HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMA/1964/2009
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court